Now accepting new criminal matters across the GTA(416) 599-1900 · 24/7 personal intake
Practice Area · 14

Driving Offences

Non-impaired driving charges still carry criminal records and licence consequences. They are defended with the same discipline.

  • 30 yearsCriminal defence practice in Ontario
  • Called 1997Bar of Ontario
  • LSO #51731AVerify on the LSO directory
  • All courtsThrough the Court of Appeal for Ontario
  • 24/7Personal intake · (416) 599-1900
The Short Answer

Do I need a dangerous driving lawyer in Toronto?

Yes. Dangerous driving is a Criminal Code offence, and a dangerous driving lawyer in Toronto can test whether your driving was truly a marked departure from the norm — the legal standard — and pursue a reduction to careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act. Aaron M. Spektor, admitted at every level of Ontario court through the Court of Appeal, has defended criminal driving charges for 30 years. A conviction carries a criminal record and licence consequences.

Answer by Aaron M. Spektor, criminal defence lawyer · LSO #51731A · called to the Bar of Ontario in 1997

Charge
Dangerous operation, Criminal Code s. 320.13
Max penalty
10 yrs; 14 if bodily harm; life if death
Where heard
Toronto Courthouse, 10 Armoury St
Your lawyer
Aaron M. Spektor · LSO #51731A · 30 years
Overview

What this practice is, and is not.

Driving offences under the Criminal Code — distinct from impaired driving — include dangerous operation, fail to remain at the scene, criminal negligence, and street racing. Each carries the same criminal-record consequences as any other Criminal Code conviction, plus licence implications under provincial law.

Aaron M. Spektor defends these matters across the Greater Toronto Area. The defence work focuses on what the Crown can actually prove — whether the driving was, objectively, a marked departure from the standard; whether the accused knew of the collision before leaving; whether identification is firm.

Many of these cases resolve through Crown withdrawal, reduction to a Highway Traffic Act offence (no record), or conditional discharge. The cases that proceed to trial are defended on the elements the Crown most often struggles to prove.

Criminal driving offences — dangerous driving, fail to remain (leaving the scene), criminal negligence in the operation of a vehicle, and flight from police — are Criminal Code charges, distinct from Highway Traffic Act tickets, and a conviction carries a criminal record and a driving prohibition.

Aaron M. Spektor defends criminal driving offences by testing the manner-of-driving evidence, causation, and identity, and — where appropriate — negotiating a reduction to a non-criminal Highway Traffic Act offence.

What we handle

Representative engagements.

  • 01

    Dangerous Operation of a Conveyance (s. 320.13)

    Driving prosecutions turning on the marked-departure standard — defended on the conduct, the circumstances, and the objective analysis.

  • 02

    Fail to Remain (s. 320.16)

    Hit-and-run / fail to stop at accident — defended on knowledge of the collision and identification of the driver.

  • 03

    Criminal Negligence in Operation

    More serious driving charges, frequently arising from collisions causing bodily harm or death.

  • 04

    Street Racing (s. 320.14)

    Street-racing prosecutions — defended on the racing element and identification.

  • 05

    Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm or Death

    Indictable matters with custodial exposure — full trial defence including accident-reconstruction work.

  • 06

    Licence Suspension Defence

    Administrative-suspension issues running parallel to the criminal case.

Our Approach

How we work this practice.

  1. 1

    Re-examine the driving conduct.

    'Dangerous driving' is a specific legal standard — not a police characterization. Defence frames the conduct against the actual standard.

  2. 2

    Test the knowledge element on fail-to-remain.

    The Crown must prove the accused knew a collision occurred. In many lower-impact cases, that knowledge is contestable.

  3. 3

    Engage accident reconstruction where useful.

    Independent reconstruction frequently reveals defence-favourable conclusions the original investigation missed.

  4. 4

    Pursue HTA resolution where appropriate.

    Reduction to a Highway Traffic Act charge avoids a criminal record and is achievable in many cases where the criminal-standard evidence is weak.

The marked-departure test

Dangerous Driving Lawyer Toronto: Legal Test and Licence Impact

What the Crown must prove

Under section 320.13, the Crown must prove that you operated a conveyance in a manner that, considering all the circumstances, was dangerous to the public, and that your conduct was a marked departure from what a reasonably prudent driver would have done. The Supreme Court’s decisions in Beatty and Roy make clear that a momentary lapse of attention usually is not enough; in R. v. Chung (2020), it held that a brief burst of extreme speed in a busy urban area can be. The analysis is fact-specific and often turns on reconstruction evidence.

How driving evidence is collected

In serious collisions, Toronto Police Traffic Services reconstructionists map the scene, examine the vehicles and may download event data recorders that capture speed, braking and throttle in the seconds before impact. Dash-cam, transit and intersection video, along with phone records, are often sought. Each source has limits — recorder accuracy, video frame rates, timestamp drift — and the way it was obtained may raise search-and-seizure issues. Preserve your own dash-cam footage, repair records and phone logs before they are lost.

Licence consequences run on two tracks

A criminal court may prohibit you from driving as part of the sentence. Separately, Ontario’s Highway Traffic Act imposes its own licence suspension on conviction for dangerous driving and related Criminal Code offences, and insurers treat a conviction as high-risk for years. Stunt driving and racing charges under the HTA are different — non-criminal offences with roadside suspensions and impoundment — explained in our stunt driving guide.

Sentencing and resolution options

Dangerous driving without injury is hybrid, carries no mandatory minimum and remains eligible for a discharge. Fail to remain under section 320.16 follows the same penalty structure, with higher maximums where bodily harm or death results. A negotiated plea to careless driving keeps you out of the criminal record system entirely. Where a collision caused injury, the Crown is more likely to proceed by indictment, and a defence reconstruction expert is often essential. If alcohol or drugs are also alleged, see impaired driving, and for courthouse details see our Toronto courts guide.

Common Questions

Things clients ask before retaining us.

If yours is not on this list, please ask. We answer every intake inquiry personally.

Is dangerous driving the same as careless driving?

No. Careless driving is a Highway Traffic Act offence with no criminal record. Dangerous driving is a Criminal Code offence. Many defence resolutions in this area focus on reduction from dangerous (Criminal Code) to careless (HTA).

I didn't know I hit anything. Can I be convicted of fail to remain?

Knowledge of the collision is an element the Crown must prove. In many fail-to-remain cases — particularly low-impact contacts — the knowledge element is genuinely contestable. We assess at the outset.

Will I lose my licence on a dangerous-driving conviction?

Usually, yes. A Criminal Code conviction for dangerous driving allows the court to impose a driving prohibition, and Ontario separately suspends your licence on conviction — at least one year for a first offence under the Highway Traffic Act, and longer for repeat or more serious offences. We address both tracks in the defence and sentencing strategy.

How does street racing differ from dangerous driving?

Street racing requires proof of a competitive driving element with at least one other vehicle. It carries enhanced penalties and frequently arises from speed-based traffic stops. The defence often focuses on whether the racing element is actually proven.

Is dangerous driving a criminal offence?

Yes. Dangerous operation of a conveyance is a Criminal Code offence, separate from a careless-driving ticket, and a conviction creates a criminal record. The Crown must prove the driving was a marked departure from the standard of a reasonable driver.

What is 'fail to remain' (leaving the scene of an accident)?

Failing to stop at the scene of an accident with intent to escape liability is a Criminal Code offence. Intent is a key element — leaving without that intent, or for a lawful reason, can be a defence.

Can a criminal driving charge be reduced to a traffic offence?

Sometimes. Where the criminal case has weaknesses, a reduction to a Highway Traffic Act offence such as careless driving — which is not a criminal charge — may be negotiable, avoiding a criminal record.

What is the penalty for dangerous driving causing bodily harm in Canada?

Dangerous operation causing bodily harm under section 320.13(2) of the Criminal Code carries up to 14 years’ imprisonment on indictment, or up to two years less a day summarily, with minimum punishments under section 320.2 of a $1,000 fine for a first offence, 30 days for a second and 120 days for subsequent offences. A driving prohibition can also be ordered. If death results, the maximum is life. Whether the driving was truly dangerous, not merely careless, is often decisive.

What happens if I drive while suspended in Ontario?

Under section 53 of the Highway Traffic Act, driving while suspended currently carries a fine of $1,000 to $5,000 for a first offence (higher fines have been legislated but not yet proclaimed), up to six months in jail, and an extra six-month suspension. If the suspension stems from a Criminal Code conviction, fines rise to $5,000–$25,000. Driving while prohibited by a criminal court order is a separate criminal offence under section 320.18 of the Criminal Code.

Is fleeing from police a criminal offence in Canada?

Yes. Under section 320.17 of the Criminal Code, it is an offence to operate a motor vehicle or vessel while being pursued by a peace officer and fail, without reasonable excuse, to stop as soon as is reasonable. It is a hybrid offence with a maximum of 10 years on indictment, and a driving prohibition can be imposed. The Crown must prove you knew you were being pursued, so lights, sirens, distance and visibility are often key evidence.

Is stunt driving a criminal offence in Ontario?

No. Stunt driving and street racing under section 172 of the Highway Traffic Act are provincial offences, so a conviction does not create a criminal record. The penalties are still severe: a 30-day roadside licence suspension and 14-day vehicle impound, then on conviction a fine of $2,000 to $10,000, possible jail of up to six months, and a licence suspension of at least one year for a first conviction and three years for a second. Aaron M. Spektor defends these charges.

Case Outcomes

Results in driving offences matters.

Selected, anonymized outcomes. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome — every matter is assessed on its own facts.

View all case results
Next step

Schedule a confidential consultation.

Aaron reviews every inquiry personally and responds within one business day — typically sooner.