Harassment & Threats
Threat and harassment charges hinge on what was actually said, in what context, and how the reasonable listener understood it.
- 30 yearsCriminal defence practice in Ontario
- Called 1997Bar of Ontario
- LSO #51731AVerify on the LSO directory
- All courtsThrough the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- 24/7Personal intake · (416) 599-1900
Do I need an uttering threats lawyer in Toronto?
Yes, if you have been charged. An uttering threats lawyer in Toronto examines the exact words, their context and your intent — the elements the Crown must prove — and often resolves first allegations with a peace bond and no criminal record. Aaron M. Spektor, called to the Ontario Bar in 1997, has defended threats and criminal harassment charges for 30 years. Threats to cause death or bodily harm carry up to five years if the Crown proceeds by indictment.
Answer by Aaron M. Spektor, criminal defence lawyer · LSO #51731A · called to the Bar of Ontario in 1997
- Charge
- Criminal Code s. 264.1 (threats), s. 264 (harassment)
- Max penalty
- 5 yrs threats; 10 yrs criminal harassment
- Where heard
- Toronto Courthouse, 10 Armoury St
- Your lawyer
- Aaron M. Spektor · LSO #51731A · called 1997
What this practice is, and is not.
Threat and harassment prosecutions under sections 264 and 264.1 of the Criminal Code are highly fact-specific. They turn on the actual words used, the context in which they were used, and the inferences the trier of fact can fairly draw about intent and effect.
Aaron M. Spektor defends harassment and threats matters arising from family disputes, workplace conflicts, online communications, and broken relationships. The first defence work is usually to retrieve the actual communications — texts, emails, social media — and to read them in the context the Crown's summary often ignores.
Many of these matters resolve with peace bonds, withdrawals, or no-record dispositions. Others — particularly criminal-harassment files involving stalking allegations — require full trial defence.
Uttering threats (section 264.1) and criminal harassment or stalking (section 264) frequently arise out of domestic, workplace, or online disputes. The Crown must prove not just the words or conduct but the required intent and, for harassment, that the complainant reasonably feared for their safety.
Aaron M. Spektor defends uttering threats and criminal harassment charges by testing context, intent, and credibility, and — in appropriate cases — resolving matters through a peace bond that avoids a criminal record.
Representative engagements.
- 01
Uttering Threats (s. 264.1)
Threats to cause death, bodily harm, or property damage — defended on the words used, context, and reasonable interpretation.
- 02
Criminal Harassment (s. 264)
Stalking, repeated communication, watching, and conduct that causes the complainant to fear for their safety.
- 03
Harassing Communications (s. 372)
Indecent or harassing communications by telephone or electronic means — often arising from broken relationships.
- 04
Online Harassment
Social-media-based prosecutions — defended on attribution, context, and the freedom-of-expression analysis where applicable.
- 05
Peace Bond Resolution
Common-law and s. 810 peace bonds that resolve the matter without a criminal record.
- 06
Trial Defence
Where resolution is unavailable, full preparation including communications-discovery review and complainant cross-examination.
How we work this practice.
- 1
Retrieve the actual communications.
The Crown's summary often paraphrases. Defence works from the actual words, in the actual context, in chronological order.
- 2
Test the intent element.
Threats require an intent to intimidate; harassment requires knowledge or recklessness as to fear. Both are contestable on the facts.
- 3
Pursue peace bond resolution where appropriate.
Many threat and harassment matters resolve on a s. 810 peace bond, which avoids a criminal record while still imposing conditions.
- 4
Try the case when the defence is strong.
Where the words do not amount to a threat, or where the harassment elements are not made out, we set the matter down for trial.
Uttering Threats Lawyer Toronto: The Legal Test and Next Steps
The two-part test for a threat
Under section 264.1, the Crown must first prove that the words, viewed objectively by a reasonable person aware of the circumstances, conveyed a threat of death, bodily harm, property damage or harm to an animal. It must then prove you meant them to intimidate or to be taken seriously. In R. v. McRae (2013), the Supreme Court confirmed that the threat need not reach its target and that no one has to have felt afraid. Hyperbole and dark humour can fall short once context is properly examined.
Criminal harassment is a different offence
Criminal harassment under section 264 requires proof of prohibited conduct — repeated following or communication, watching a home or workplace, or threatening conduct — that the complainant was harassed, that you knew or were reckless about that, and that the conduct caused a fear for safety that was reasonable in the circumstances. It carries up to ten years, double the maximum for threats, which matters for permanent residents facing immigration consequences. Threatening conduct directed at the complainant or a family member can be proven by a single incident, but contact that was mutual or welcomed at the time can undermine the fear element.
What to do in the first 48 hours
Do not reply to the complainant, post about the dispute or ask friends to pass on messages; each can become fresh evidence or a breach of your release. Do not delete accounts or threads — preserve the full conversation, not just screenshots of the worst lines, because context often favours the defence. Note anyone who heard the words spoken. Police commonly obtain production orders for platform and phone records, so assume the record is complete. More detail is in uttering threats charges in Ontario.
Resolution and sentencing
Both offences are hybrid, carry no mandatory minimum and remain eligible for absolute or conditional discharges. Many first allegations resolve through a section 810 peace bond. If the dispute involves a partner or family member, it is prosecuted under the domestic-violence policy — see domestic assault. A court may also impose a weapons prohibition.
The legislation behind a harassment & threats charge.
Official text on the federal and Ontario legislation websites. Aaron M. Spektor reviews this page against the current law.
Things clients ask before retaining us.
If yours is not on this list, please ask. We answer every intake inquiry personally.
I was just venting. Is that really a threat?
Maybe not. The case law (R. v. Clemente) requires that the words be intended to intimidate or be taken seriously. Words spoken in anger, with no objective intent to threaten, can fall short of the offence. Context is critical.
What is a peace bond and will it leave a record?
A peace bond is an order requiring you to keep the peace and follow conditions for up to twelve months. It is not a conviction and does not result in a criminal record, though it remains visible in some background checks for its duration.
Can I be charged for what I said online?
Yes — sections 264, 264.1, and 372 all apply to electronic communications. Online conduct is also frequently better-documented than offline conduct, which cuts both ways at trial.
The complainant blocked me. Why am I charged with harassment?
Repeated unwanted communication, even if rebuffed, can establish the conduct element of criminal harassment. The Crown must also prove the complainant feared for their safety. Both elements are defensible on the facts in many cases.
Can I be charged with uttering threats even if I didn't mean it?
The Crown must prove you intended the words to be taken seriously or to intimidate. Words said in anger, in jest, or without the required intent may not meet the test — context and intent are central to the defence.
What is criminal harassment (stalking)?
Criminal harassment covers repeated following or communication, watching a person's home or workplace, or threatening conduct that causes the complainant to reasonably fear for their safety. Whether the conduct meets that legal threshold is often contested.
Can a threats or harassment charge be resolved with a peace bond?
Often, yes. A peace bond under section 810 — a promise to keep the peace for a period — frequently resolves these matters with the charge withdrawn and no criminal record, particularly for a first allegation.
What is the penalty for uttering threats in Ontario?
Threatening death or bodily harm under section 264.1 of the Criminal Code carries up to five years’ imprisonment on indictment, or up to two years less a day summarily. Threatening to damage property or harm someone’s animal carries up to two years on indictment. Many first-time uttering threats cases end without jail — through a peace bond, diversion or a discharge — but threats involving weapons, intimate partners or prior incidents are treated more seriously.
Is sending too many texts a crime in Canada?
It can be. Section 372(3) of the Criminal Code makes it an offence to repeatedly communicate with someone by text, phone, email or other telecommunication, without lawful excuse, intending to harass them — punishable by up to two years. If the messages would reasonably make the recipient fear for their safety, the charge may be criminal harassment under section 264, which carries up to 10 years. Context, tone and the history between the parties matter a great deal.
Can someone get a restraining order against me in Ontario without charging me?
Yes. A person can apply to a justice of the peace for a peace bond under section 810 of the Criminal Code if they reasonably fear you will injure them, their partner or child, or damage their property — no criminal charge is needed. In family disputes, an Ontario family court can also issue a restraining order. Both impose conditions, and breaching them is an offence. You are entitled to respond, so get advice before agreeing to any terms.
What happens if I breach a peace bond in Ontario?
Breaching a peace bond is a criminal offence under section 811 of the Criminal Code, punishable by up to four years’ imprisonment on indictment, or as a summary offence. Unlike the peace bond itself, a conviction for breaching it creates a criminal record. Police usually arrest on an alleged breach, which can complicate release. Defences include lack of knowledge, accidental contact and whether a condition was actually broken. Aaron M. Spektor defends breach allegations at bail and trial.
A record of results across every practice area.
Selected, anonymized outcomes. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome — every matter is assessed on its own facts.
Plain-language guides from Aaron.
Written and legally reviewed by Aaron M. Spektor, with links to the governing legislation.
Uttering Threats Charge in Ontario: Penalties & Defences (2026)
Read the guide Your Rights · 7 min readPeace Bond in Ontario: Section 810 Explained (2026)
Read the guide Criminal Records · 7 min readAbsolute vs. Conditional Discharge in Canada: What Happens to Your Record (2026)
Read the guideSchedule a confidential consultation.
Aaron reviews every inquiry personally and responds within one business day — typically sooner.
Other charges Aaron defends.
Spektor Law handles 16 distinct categories of criminal and quasi-criminal offences. View the complete list →
Impaired Driving / DUI
Over 80, Refusal, Care or Control — and the Charter motions that win them.
Learn more 02Assault
Simple assault, assault causing bodily harm, aggravated assault, assault with a weapon.
Learn more 03Domestic Assault
Charges where the complainant is a spouse, partner, or family member — and the bail conditions that follow.
Learn more 04Sexual Offences
Sexual assault, invitation to sexual touching, sexual exploitation, child-related offences.
Learn more